Dear Crop-Duster:
I am posting your e-mails and have asked anyone who wishes to
comment on them, to do so directly to you. Malaria was
here in the Colonial and Pioneering days and was basically
eradicated in the USA because of agricultural drainage,
screening, better hygeine and common sense. It is not
our job to prove your pesticide POISONS are "safe" -
it is yours. You are the one who is using/misusing these
POISONS. Have you ever bothered to read a Material
Safety data Sheet or MSDS? What part of the MSDS
did you not understand was dangerous? Do you realize
that only the active ingredient in the pesticide formula is
considered? I am sending your "unbiased"
comments that there are no deaths "proven" from the
use of agricultural pesticides; to the people at
Migrant Legal Aid, in care of Shelly Davis, Esq. and various
other toxiclogists, lawyers, epidemiolists, scientists,
etc. Talk about biased fallacies! That one is
truly amazing!
I would like to remind you that all “registered”
volatile, synthetic pesticides are poisons and should only be
used as a last resort. These poisons do not stay in one
place...they drift or volatilize and contaminate
everything. Your most important responsibility
is to cause as little harm to everything except the
pest. Natural forces, e..g., climate, natural enemies,
geographic barriers, shelter and food/water availability, act
on all organisms, causing their populations to rise and fall
naturally. You have a brain over 200,000 times as large
as your enemy; if you bother to use it, you will win; if
you continue to use your “registered” pesticide poisons,
we all will continue to lose.
TRUE IPM SUMMARY
The Art of War
In any war, one must have a sword (an offensive weapon) and a
shield (defensive protection) - with volatile, synthetic
pesticide poisons we (who are not spraying these POISONS) have
no shield, no protection and your only “weapon” is
attacking us and not our enemy.
In 1993, 140,000 pesticide exposures, were reported
nationwide to poison control centers - about 25% had (acute)
pesticide poisoning symptoms (over half involved children
under 6).
The poison industry is also very aware that volatile,
synthetic pesticide poisons kill beneficial insects and fungus
better than they do the pests. One University that tests
pesticides on pests wrote me how they use synthetic
insecticides and fungicides to protect their resident pest
populations! An example of predator-prey relationships
that are adversely affected by pesticides is a black fly
predator, the caddisfly, which is susceptible to permethrin at
rates lower than those necessary to control blackfly.
The phytoseiid mites have an LD50 15 times lower to permethrin
than the spider mites on which they prey. Obviously,
many beneficial insects, e.g., bees, are also killed when one
"treats" pests with your volatile, synthetic
pesticide poisons!
The Chinese Sage, Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War”
written in China 500 B.C. clearly warns: “There has never
been a protracted war from which a country has
benefited.”
Since the 1940’s advent of volatile, synthetic pesticide
poisons we have waged a protracted war against pest
populations and now our air, water, food, mother’s milk,
blood, and adipose tissue all “normally” contain residues
of many of these "protective" poisons, their
metabolites and contaminates! We have suffered an
ever-increasing array of health effects, damages, and death -
yet our pest “enemy” continues not only to flourish, but
to increase. We have continually killed our own allies
(the beneficials), poisoned our own wells, air, and food and,
thereby, sickened, wounded or killed ourselves and our own
forces and continually ignored our enemy’s natural
weaknesses and engaged in warfare using only one (useless)
weapon! We have totally forgotten how to protect
ourselves and how to successfully wage war on our pest
enemy. In 1950 fewer than 20 species of insects showed
signs of pesticide resistance. In 1960 Rachel Carson had
documented 137 species resistant to at least one pesticide
poison and noted it was the early rumblings of an avalanche of
synthetic pesticide resistance. By 1990 the number of
documented pesticide-resistant insect and mite species was 504
and, obviously, is still increasing. In addition, we
have many other pesticide resistances developing, e.g.,
bacteria, fungus, weeds, etc.
In 1993, 1 in 7 Americans got cancer. We now have spent
$25 billion on cancer research (a river of gold), now 1 out of
every 2 Americans will get cancer and it was earlier projected
that by the year 2000, breast cancer will be the #1 killer and
prostate cancer will be the #2 killer of Americans! At
present, at least one in eight women will get breast
cancer. Since 1960, more than 950,000 have died from
breast cancer - almost half of these deaths have occurred in
the last 10 years! Putting this in perspective - only
617,000 Americans have died in all the wars our country has
fought this century! Unless we desire death of our own
race, we must stop releasing tons of virtually untested,
unstable, synthetic pesticide poisons that are creating a
synergistic contamination that no one can honestly say they
can truly assess all of the human health risks for and which
still does not even control our pest enemy! Some of the
"inerts" can continue to contaminate for much longer
than the active ingredients, e.g., some "inerts"
have a half-life of greater than 880 years! As you well
know, we can not and will not test your various POISONS
on groups of innocent people, so, we will never be able to
conclusively PROVE that your various toxins are the chronic
cause of any of their deaths. I would only note that if
you combine the exposures of bleach and ammonia together the
resulting toxicity will kill people. There never
have been any tests done on your "registered"
POISONS (and their various interactions) to determine any of
their synergistic health effects!
Yet, the U.S. annually still blasts itself with about 4.5
billion pounds of volatile synthetic pesticide poisons
which provide fewer and fewer benefits. Despite a
ten-fold increase in the U.S. use of chemical insecticide
poisons since World War II, our loss of food and fiber crops
to insects has risen from 7 to 13 percent! By 1964
2/3’s of all U.S. insecticides were used on only 3 crops:
cotton, corn, and apples per the Mrak Commission (In 1969, the
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare prepared a
landmark report on the environmental health consequences of
pesticides - The Mrak Commission). Pimental et. al., in
Environmental and economic impacts noted that despite a
thousand-fold increase in the U.S. use on insecticides on
corn-losses to insects have an increased 400%! Cornell
University researcher, David Pimental in Silent Scourge,
Audubon, Jan./Feb. 1997 estimates that of the roughly 672
million birds annually exposed to pesticides in the U.S. - 10%
- (at least) 67 million - of our allies are killed
annually! (Note: In the 1990s over 5 to 6 billion pounds
of insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, and
other biocides were added to the world’s environment.)
The concepts of synthetic pesticide resistance, pest
resurgence and the development of secondary pest problems have
been taught (and then ignored) in introductory science classes
for literally decades! Since synthetic pesticide poisons
were introduced into agriculture at the end of World War II,
total crop losses due to insect damage has almost doubled -
from 7% in the 1940’s, when all agriculture was essentially
organic, to 13% by the end of the 1980’s. In 1945
almost no insecticide use was used on corn and the USDA noted
insect damage averaged about 3.5%. Entomological
Journals are filled with pesticide resistance problems
developing all over the world - synthetic pesticides quickly
create resistant or immune pests.
In the 1990s approximately 5% of all farms controlled over
half of the Nation’s agricultural production and our smaller
farmers were going out of business by the thousands, all while
economic consolidations using mergers, takeovers, and
conglomerations in the food industry are being magnified a
hundred-fold - we now are almost totally dependent on the
poison industry - and your resulting "protective"
contamination is now universal. .
The clarity of Sun Tzu’s thought is still acted upon by
Chinese generals of today; it is “The supreme art of war is
to subdue the enemy without fighting.” This supreme
art is what I have continually developed upon in my
intelligent pest management manual entitled: The Best
Control©. I, like Sun Tzu, believe “The skillful
strategist should be able to subdue the enemy’s army without
engaging it, to take his cities without laying siege to them,
and to overthrow his State without bloodying swords”.
One of Sun Tzu’s admirers was Mao Tse Tung - in Chiang Kai -
Shek’s army - most of the younger officers considered Sun
Tzu’s thoughts to be out-of-date and hardly worth study in
the era of mechanized weapons. Chairman Mao Tse-Tung
disagreed with his enemy and in May, 1928 wrote “on
protracted war”, selected works Vol. II page 156 that “The
object of war is specifically to preserve oneself and
destroy the enemy” (to destroy the enemy means to disarm him
or “deprive him of the power to resist”, and does not mean
to destroy every member of his forces physically.).
This “truth” taken from the “Little Red Book”,
contains the essence to true IPM. To use your toxic
poisons that do not preserve us, but rather destroy our own
people, pets, and natural allies without even diminishing,
much less destroying our pest enemy, but which in truth
actually preserves our pest enemy and even prospers our pest
enemy is to insure the annihilation of those things (including
yourself) you are supposedly trying to "protect and
preserve"!
All of the guiding principles of military operations
grow out of this one basic principle: to strive to the utmost
to preserve one’s own strength and destroy that of the enemy
. . . to release toxins nerve gases, carcinogens,
mutagens, etc. (poisons) into one’s own ambient air, food,
or water is to insure our own defeat or destruction - while
preserving that of our resistant pest enemy, and totally
ignores the basis of all successful military principles!
The communist Chinese Red Army defeated General Chiang Kai-Shek
using this very principle and Mao noted that “without
preparedness - superiority is not real superiority and there
can be no initiative either. Having grasped this point,
a force which is inferior, but prepared can often defeat a
superior enemy by surprise attack.” I warn you our
“inferior” pest enemy is already resistant to your
“superior’ pesticides and is already winning the war -
common sense (which is not too common) and the use of true IPM
as written in The Best Control© will yet turn the tide in our
favor.
Sincerely, Stephen L. Tvedten
The response
from the crop-duster is not published here because of privacy
issues. The response contains 438 words. It
attacked Mr. Tvedten with claims that his facts are
incorrect. This attack was made with no supporting
documentation and suggested that Mr. Tvedten eat organically
grown produce.
.